<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When is a quality mark not a quality mark?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/blog/when-is-a-quality-mark-not-a-quality-mark/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/blog/when-is-a-quality-mark-not-a-quality-mark</link>
	<description>Market intelligence for law firms of the future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 12:15:39 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Gough</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/blog/when-is-a-quality-mark-not-a-quality-mark/comment-page-1#comment-5319</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Gough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/?p=4922#comment-5319</guid>
		<description>The number of organisations applying for CQS accreditation is now substantially higher than the 200 referred to (Law Soc. confirmed this last week). The main thrust of it is to assure the probity of the people and organisations offering conveyancing services. The take up will be further assured if the CML make it a pre-requisite for panel membership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The number of organisations applying for CQS accreditation is now substantially higher than the 200 referred to (Law Soc. confirmed this last week). The main thrust of it is to assure the probity of the people and organisations offering conveyancing services. The take up will be further assured if the CML make it a pre-requisite for panel membership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Murden</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/blog/when-is-a-quality-mark-not-a-quality-mark/comment-page-1#comment-5299</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Murden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/?p=4922#comment-5299</guid>
		<description>It is a great shame that the Law Societys&#039; drive for quality does not extend to it&#039;s own website pages relating to the CQS scheme. It is riddled with unfinished documents (the Word &quot;deleted&quot; markups are in some, there are links and references to documents which just don&#039;t exist relating to locums and a CQS helpline persdon admitted to me today that the documents had not actually been finsished yet.

There&#039;s a tin of chocholates called Quality Street but the contents are nothing special</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a great shame that the Law Societys&#8217; drive for quality does not extend to it&#8217;s own website pages relating to the CQS scheme. It is riddled with unfinished documents (the Word &#8220;deleted&#8221; markups are in some, there are links and references to documents which just don&#8217;t exist relating to locums and a CQS helpline persdon admitted to me today that the documents had not actually been finsished yet.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a tin of chocholates called Quality Street but the contents are nothing special</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
