<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An open and shut case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/blog/an-open-shut-case/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/blog/an-open-shut-case</link>
	<description>Market intelligence for law firms of the future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 12:15:39 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salisbury Solicitor</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/blog/an-open-shut-case/comment-page-1#comment-63491</link>
		<dc:creator>Salisbury Solicitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 09:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/?p=13688#comment-63491</guid>
		<description>Covering up reports is nothing new. Did you ever hear of, let alone read the “Review of Demand, Supply and Purchasing Arrangements – Survey of Legal Aid Firms 2003&quot; commissioned by the Department for Constitutional affairs and carried out by Otterburn Legal Consulting. Didn&#039;t think so. I fortunately got hold of a copy because one of my mates was partner of one of the small number of firms participating in the review. It changed my thinking – from being a predominantly legal aid firm, we conducted a very slow and expensive  process of dumping almost all our legal aid cases, replacing them with proper work. It was the best thing I ever did in business.

Apart from my own copy, I have never seen mention of this report or talked to anyone who was familiar with it – apart from one well-known legal academic – who confirmed to me that it had apparently been published very quietly three or  four years later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Covering up reports is nothing new. Did you ever hear of, let alone read the “Review of Demand, Supply and Purchasing Arrangements – Survey of Legal Aid Firms 2003&#8243; commissioned by the Department for Constitutional affairs and carried out by Otterburn Legal Consulting. Didn&#8217;t think so. I fortunately got hold of a copy because one of my mates was partner of one of the small number of firms participating in the review. It changed my thinking – from being a predominantly legal aid firm, we conducted a very slow and expensive  process of dumping almost all our legal aid cases, replacing them with proper work. It was the best thing I ever did in business.</p>
<p>Apart from my own copy, I have never seen mention of this report or talked to anyone who was familiar with it – apart from one well-known legal academic – who confirmed to me that it had apparently been published very quietly three or  four years later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Balls</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/blog/an-open-shut-case/comment-page-1#comment-61165</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Balls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 04:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/?p=13688#comment-61165</guid>
		<description>Surely these guys know the meaning of  &#039;transparency&#039;, perhaps not...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely these guys know the meaning of  &#8216;transparency&#8217;, perhaps not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hailstone</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/blog/an-open-shut-case/comment-page-1#comment-61051</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hailstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/?p=13688#comment-61051</guid>
		<description>Well said Neil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Neil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
