Vinciworks free guide: compliance training in a post CPD era

Print This Post

17 February 2016


Vinciworks200There seems to be a common misconception in the legal profession that the SRA’s changes to CPD hail the end of formal compliance training. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Compliance training on topics such as money laundering training, bribery, diversity, data protection etc. remains mandatory irrespective of any CPD changes.

The SRA has reiterated on numerous occasions that changes to CPD will have no impact on other mandatory training required by legislative or regulatory bodies; nor will it affect industry best practice. For example, in the SRA’s money laundering guidance:

We have recently changed our approach to continuing competence, deciding to remove the requirement for a certain number of hours of CPD and allowing firms to arrange appropriate training at their own discretion.

Anti-money laundering training and the policies that underpin it, remain a legal requirement as noted above, and firms should consider this as part of their continuing competence planning

VinciWorks has developed a free guide to the requirements and best practice for compliance training at law firms. It enables firms to verify that they are compliant with all laws and regulations.

The guide covers the training requirements stipulated in the following:

  • Outcomes Focused Regulation (OFR)
  • The SRA Handbook
  • The Lexcel accreditation standard (updated for v6)
  • Money Laundering Regulation 2007
  • UK Bribery Act 2010

In addition, the guide provides a full training plan for onboarding and refresher training.

Fill out the form here to receive the free guide.



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017