Tina Gosal joins the Legal Eye team

Print This Post

2 December 2013


The Legal Eye team has expanded once again and welcomes the newest member, Tina Gosal.  Tina will be based in London.

Tina is a qualified solicitor and has been practicing matrimonial law for the past 5 years at two Legal 500, Lexcel Accredited firms.

Despite enjoying a fruitful and successful career, Tina has always been drawn towards the compliance and regulatory issues that have taken over the structure and progression of all law firms.  Tina says “it is apparent that more than ever compliance is at the forefront for all law firms.  The pressure that is on firms to meet regulatory standards is directly competing with the amount of time that legal professionals have available for fee earning work.  This is where Legal Eye is an effective solution for all law firms juggling their time.

Prior to qualifying as a solicitor, Tina successfully fulfilled the role of Compliance/Quality Assurance Manager, achieving the highest standard for her company by the regulatory body at the first annual inspection.  In her new role with Legal Eye, Tina will assist all sizes of law firms to achieve best practice and manage risk effectively.

Jaunita Gobby, founder and director of Legal Eye:  “Great way to end off 2013 – with a new team member!  We have many exciting projects planned for 2014 and Tina will be a great asset.  Many of our solicitor clients are working towards CQS and Lexcel accreditation and after that they will work towards the Legal Eye Quality Standard (LEQS). Our licensed conveyancer clients are working towards LEQS and that number is growing every week – great to see so many firms embracing best practice and risk management.”



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Legal Futures Blog

The importance of being expert

Steve Rowley 3

I recently sat on a panel debate in Manchester, with the debate entitled – ATE insurers and sub-£250k claims. Whilst the title of the debate was probably written ahead of the government’s consultation paper to introducing fixed recoverable costs in lower-value clinical negligence claims, where £25,000 rather than £250,000 is being recommended, it nevertheless raised an interesting point on how after-the-event insurers can make premiums proportionate to damages, especially for cases worth less than £25,000.

April 26th, 2017