The year of enforcement – Weightmans LLP outlines key issues for legal sector in 2014

Print This Post

6 January 2014


National law firm Weightmans LLP today warns that 2014 will see unprecedented pressures for the legal sector, advising legal organisations to step up their compliance and risk management activity in order to stay on top of these developments.

The firm’s Legal Services Group, which was set up in response to the increasing pressures and change the legal sector is facing and is dedicated to providing advice and support to law firms on all of these issues, warns that the following are likely to pose the biggest risks to law firms and ABSs in 2014:

1)    Stricter enforcement

Two years on from the launch of Outcomes Focussed Regulation and the new Handbook, the SRA has had enough time to determine the levels of compliance and consider rigorous enforcement. Richard Collins, Executive Director of Policy, Risk, Strategy, Communications, Standards and Research at the SRA has warned that ‘2014 will be the year of enforcement’.

– The slaying of the COLP/COFA

January sees the one year anniversary of the role of the COLP/COFA, and many in these roles still remain unclear as to what a breach is and whether it is material or not – unsurprising given the lack of guidance available from the regulator.

Mike Haley, Director of Supervision at the SRA, has suggested that firms may be taken before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal for breaches so that precedents or guidance can be set.

Michelle Garlick, Partner in the Legal Services Group at Weightmans LLP, says:

“This should raise clear alarm bells for the profession. Being used as a “test case” is worrying enough, let alone considering the cost implications associated with going before the SDT – especially in the current financial climate.

“It is imperative that COLPs and COFAs have watertight arrangements in relation to their regulatory obligations and that they monitor the effectiveness of them to avoid becoming ‘scapegoats’.”

– Increased fines?

The SRA is currently consulting on a proposal to give it the power to increase the fines it can place on traditional law firms, bringing the penalties in line with those imposed on an ABS.

At present, the SRA can only impose fines of up to £2,000 on traditional law firms. If it envisages that a more serious penalty is appropriate, then it has to refer the matter to the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal. In contrast it can fine an ABS up to £250 million – a clear inconsistency. The consultation is due to close on 7 February 2014 but Weightmans questions whether increasing the SRA’s penalty powers is really the best way to ‘fix’ the problem.

– Yet ABSs are not a panacea

Given the volume of activity undertaken by the SRA with regards to ‘traditional’ law firms and the relative infancy of most ABSs, one could be forgiven for believing that they are not on the immediate radar of the SRA.  Yet Weightmans warns that those responsible for compliance within ABSs should not rest on their laurels – it is envisaged that the SRA will make initial visits during 2014 to ascertain compliance with the Handbook, with investigation and enforcement action potentially leading from these visits.

2)    Pricing models

The end of 2013 saw Quality Solicitors announce that all their members will be ditching the established model of hourly rates in favour of fixed fees for their clients.  As the legal services market becomes bigger, the more creative and competitive pricing models will become. While there is a need for pricing in the legal sector to evolve, Weightmans warns that knee jerk reactions could have an adverse effect.

“2014 will see not only more ABS failures but also more pure law firm failures, whether they are traditional partnerships, LLPs or limited companies,” says Ian Vicary, Corporate partner in the Legal Services Group at Weightmans LLP. “This will be driven by several factors including the entry into the market of more fixed fee model firms, the increasing bite of the referral fee ban, and also the tax changes making LLPs less attractive.”

3)    Partnership status changes

HMRC’s proposed Partnership Tax Reform for LLPs comes into effect on 6th April 2014, and will have a significant impact on the tax liability for salary and equity partners. There is a risk that this could have a significant financial impact on the liability of the firm.

Dominic Vincent, Insolvency partner in the Legal Services Group at Weightmans LLP says: “The recent HMRC directive regarding the tax status of LLP members provides an unwelcome reminder to professional practices that despite their best laid plans unexpected financial pressures can still arise in the most efficiently run businesses.  To avoid the risk of becoming an insolvency statistic, it is crucial to keep the business plan under constant review and take appropriate remedial steps to rectify any structural or financial issues at the earliest possibility.”

Partner Michelle Garlick concludes: “It is key to remember that Outcomes Focused Regulation, risk management, strategy development and financial management are organic beasts.  Whilst many firms spent 2013 putting in place policies and procedures to facilitate compliance with the Handbook, the roles of the COLP and COFA and a risk management framework to appease the insurers, none of this is static.

“In an increasingly competitive and precarious environment the hallmarks of a successful firm in 2014 and beyond will include a serious and ongoing focus upon regulation and compliance, together with continuous review of the business and the risks that it faces. This must be underpinned by the ability to respond and evolve to meet new challenges and exploit new opportunities.”



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Legal Futures Blog

Know your client checks – A lesson from BHS

Paul-Bennett for Legal Futures

As you will be aware, it is a legal requirement for advisory firms to carry out ‘know your client’ checks. The purpose of doing so is to confirm your client’s identity and to seek to provide protection in respect of anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing laws. The BHS experience before the House of Commons’ work and pensions committee and business, innovation and skills committee shows that firms need to think beyond AML obligations.

September 29th, 2016