The meaning of integrity

Print This Post

15 August 2016


Aaron & Partners new logo 200Partner & specialist in professional practices Paul Bennett has written this article on the meaning of integrity.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority’s Code of Conduct 2011 lists ten principles which apply to all. Principle two states, “act with integrity” but fails to define what integrity means.

A long line of cases have attempted to provide guidance including Hoodless and Blackwell v FSA [2003] UKFTT FSM007. The Financial Services and Markets Tribunal said in their judgement, “In our view ‘integrity’ connotes moral soundness, rectitude and steady adherence to an ethical code. A person lacks integrity if unable to appreciate the distinction between what is honest or dishonest by ordinary standards”.

Subsequently, in the case of the Solicitors Regulation Authority v Chan and Ors [2015] EWHC 2659 it was said, “As to want of integrity, there have been a number of decisions commenting on the import of this word as used in various regulations.

“In my view, it serves no purpose to expatiate on its meaning. Want of integrity is capable of being identified as present or not, as the case may be, by an informed tribunal or court by reference to the facts of a particular case”.

With the recent judgement of the High Court in the case of Scott v Solicitors Regulation Authority [2016] EWHC 1256, came a glimmer of hope that, finally, we would receive a definition. We were disappointed when the High Court merely said that it agrees with the approach taken in SRA v Chan and Ors.

So it seems the approach remains that integrity will be known when it is seen.

For further information and advice in relation to solicitors’ regulation, please contact our professional practices department.

Paul Bennett

Partner and professional practices and employment law

Aaron and Partners LLP

01743 453685

paul.bennett@aaronandpartners.com



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017