The future of the sector approach to IP practice

Print This Post

21 June 2012


By Joshy Thomas, solicitor in the LexisPSL IP & IT team

Growth in our economy is the key issue today. On 25 May 2012, David Willetts, the minister of state for universities and science, outlined the government’s vision for high-tech growth in a speech at the University of East Anglia.

The key points for you to take away from that speech are:

  • The government’s approach toinnovation and particularly intellectual property is changing leading to opportunities for IP practices;
  • The sector approach to business development must become more sophisticated as technology becomes more complex; and
  • Law firms that aim to thrive in the future will need to drill down more within industry sectors in order to align themselves with the clients and targets who are in the frame to lead the country back into growth.

In a shrinking legal market, companies are all motivated by achieving growth and longevity or at least surviving. Many law firms use a sector-specific approach to promote themselves to their clients and target clients. They do this by building teams of lawyers that apparently understand the particular drivers and pressures within an industry. Legal services and advice are tailored accordingly for these sector clients.

The government has also looked at sectors under its plans for high-tech growth in the economy. David Willetts has identified three elements of focus for the government: securing the research base by ring-fencing cash; creating stronger links between academic researchers and business; and identifying new technologies.

These elements provide potential opportunities for intellectual property practices. The government plans to use public funding for spin-offs from academic research. Research councils have increased their investment by a fifth, in collaborative training which involves private, public or charity research partners. The focus is exploring industrial applications for technologies rather than merely funding research.

The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council has awarded four fellowships to scientists making the transition from industry to academia: from Qinetic and IBM to Exeter, BAS to Cranfield and Talecris Biotherapeutics to UCL. Each fellow will lead a £1m research programme with commercial aims.

David Willetts’ speech deals, at a high level, with the potential gains of commercialising advances in high technology. But what is disappointing about the government’s proposal is the lack of mention of the role of intellectual property rights in these collaborations. The financial success of these projects will stem from correct handling, from the beginning, of the intellectual property rights involved.

There is opportunity here for IP experts to provide legal and strategic intellectual property advice to academics who, as a result, of a business background and the commercially sponsored aims of the project are likely to be receptive to that advice. The angle is to meet the needs of the newly appointed scientist businessperson who will fill these key fellowship roles. In order to do this, you will need to understand the new and changing technologies involved.

David Willetts refers to the July 2010 Foresight report on Technology and innovation futures: UK growth opportunities for the 2020s. This lists 53 key technologies grouped into 28 clusters, including: ambient intelligence in the built environment, display technologies, energy scavenging, hydrogen economy, synthetic biology, robotics, the cheap genome, water and photonics. Suddenly, law firms who list their sectors as, for example, manufacturing or TMT (technology, media, telecommunications) look positively out dated and clumsy.

Of the 28 clusters, several broader areas are identified as sweeping up a number of clusters: manufacturing on demand, smart infrastructure, the second Internet revolution, the energy transition, new material for a low carbon future, and regenerative medicine.

That’s the exciting new technologies highlighted, but so what? The bottom line is that the government believes that  the UK’s strength as an international centre of IP law practice is underexploited. Law firms need to rethink alliances, their expertise and how they define and promote their chosen sector.

The government is:

  • creating seven Catapult Centres to link businesses and public funding for new research projects. The seven Catapults are in: high-value manufacturing, cell therapy, offshore renewable energy, satellite applications, connected digital economy, future cities and transport systems. A series of sub-groups or special interest groups have either been set up or are in the process of being set up to help shape the discussions for many of the Catapults – getting involved may prove fruitful;
  • planning tax incentives for research and development with tax credits worth up to 225% and other tax reliefs. Tax is always an opaque area for businesses – providing expertise on the tax treatment of research and development projects is likely to be well rewarded; and
  • promoting NESTA by using inducement prizes to reward innovation – consider working with NESTA
    on an event or project.

The government says it is likely to fund research into understanding the UK’s IP strengths and weaknesses with regard to global competitors and then it will use this information to inform sector and technology-specific strategies aimed at playing to its strengths and  plugging the gaps.

A refreshed Foresight report is due out this summer from the Government Office for Science. Watch this space for an update.

 



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Lawyers must now draw on the data and drive change

Chris Marston 2014

The results from this year’s legal services consumer tracker survey make for interesting reading. In its sixth year, the research finds that a firm’s reputation continues to grow in importance, holding its top slot as the number one factor influencing choice of lawyer, with price remaining a strong second, reflected in a shift towards higher numbers of fixed-fee transactions. Alongside, it reports that trust in lawyers has declined to 42%, from 47% in 2012. It’s useful information as far as it goes, but what is the sector going to do with it?

September 26th, 2016