The assignment of CFAs

Print This Post

22 August 2016


Aaron & Partners new logo 200Partner & specialist in professional practices Paul Bennett has written this article on The Assignment of CFAs.

In Denise v Spire Healthcare Limited Case No: A13YJ811, it was decided that CFA’s cannot be assigned. However, on appeal, this decision has been reversed by HHJ Graham Wood. This was a civil appeal to the High Court.

HHJ Graham Wood stated that he could not depart from the case of Jenkins v Young Brothers [2006] EWHC 151 and that the district judge was wrong to not regard Jenkins as providing “a ratio decidendi which was binding upon him, and unequivocal, and proceeding on the basis that it was necessary for a court to establish the same context of trust and confidence which had prevailed in that case. In my judgement there is a sufficiently clear ratio, even if the present facts are distinguishable”.

It was also stated that it appears that a higher appellate court (such as the Court of Appeal) may become engaged because the question of whether a CFA can be assigned is a matter of public importance and wider consequence.

The issue is important for CFAs that were entered into before 1 April 2013 because it is the only way to ensure that the success fee and other costs remain recoverable from the opponent. If it is found that a particular CFA has not been assigned, it would mean that costs will be irrecoverable. We have advised a number of personal injury firms on this issue already.

If you have any questions in relation to your CFA, please do not hesitate to contact our professional practices department.

Paul Bennett
Partner in professional practices and employment law

Aaron and Partners LLP
01743 453685

paul.bennett@aaronandpartners.com



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Legal Futures Blog

Joint (ad)ventures in the legal sector

Nigel Wallis lo res

We all know that nothing in life is certain. As the actor, director and philosopher Clint Eastwood once said: “If you want a guarantee, buy a toaster.” He also said he’d tried being reasonable and didn’t like it. They should teach this kind of philosophy in law school. One thing in life is reasonably certain though. If you’re a law firm worth your salt, at some point you will be approached by another entity (most probably a work introducer) with a whizzy idea to ‘partner’ with you to ‘help you accelerate your growth’. In commercial speak this means, ‘we’d like to keep feeding you work but we’d also like to share in your profits’. The arrangement may be pitched to you as a joint venture – a win-win no less.

March 27th, 2017