Tandem Law builds claims business on the Peppermint platform

Print This Post

28 March 2012


Specialist bulk claims handler Tandem Law has selected the Peppermint platform to support its rapidly growing legal service business. The platform enables Tandem Law to manage its entire business through a single IT platform.

Tandem Law has a strong reputation as specialists in bulk claims handling for clinical negligence, debt recovery, litigation and high-end personal injury work. The firm’s success has led to the adoption of an innovative business model where professional negligence claims are received in bulk and handled through a highly automated process.

Powerful BPM (business process management) capability within the Peppermint platform provides tight process control alongside easy and dynamic management reporting. This ensures client service-level agreements are adhered to, as well as delivering proactive risk management, alert systems and automated escalation paths. The firm also wants to ensure it complements efficiency with a highly personalised service to clients and referrers 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Michael Fong, head of legal technical operations at Tandem Law, said: “We looked at, and even implement, other legal technologies but found Peppermint was the only solution to offer a single platform to deliver a highly automated system whilst providing a level of client care that differentiates us from other providers.”

Arlene Adams, founder and CEO of Peppermint Technology, said: “Tandem Law is a great example of a firm grasping the opportunity in the evolving claims market. They understand the competitive importance of technology and data in delivering a highly automated and client-centric claims business.”



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate

Tags: ,



Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017