SearchFlow comments on HMRC’s latest release of UK Property Transaction Data

Print This Post

23 February 2016


Searchflow 2016HMRC’s data has revealed a seasonally adjusted decrease of 2.8% in transaction levels between December 2015 and January 2016. With a 27.5% monthly reduction in non-adjusted residential transaction, HMRC stated that a monthly decrease of this magnitude is usual in January.  There is a 9.7% increase in transaction levels compared to the same month last year.

Maud Rousseau, group marketing and communications director at SearchFlow, comments: “The housing market is buoyant. HMRC’s data indicates a significant increase in activity compared to this time last year and this is also reflected in the CML’s data that recently revealed the highest level of lending in January for eight years.

“It is widely anticipated that there will be a rush to complete property purchases prior to April, ahead of the introduction of the extra 3% stamp duty charge for additional homes.

“This can be reflected in our latest conveyancing sentiment survey with almost a third of our respondents preparing for activity levels to increase by 10% to 20% in the first quarter of this year. But now that the referendum date has been set, we are then likely to see the transaction level dip as any uncertainty surrounding a potential Brexit gains momentum.

“However, with the economy strong, employment level high, interest rates low and the economic and housing policies unlikely to change very much; once the dust settles there is very likely to be a post-referendum boost to activity levels, regardless of the outcome. Pent up demand and a short supply of housing will continue to drive the market.”

 



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017