New name for Litigation Costs Services as it develops ‘Jackson compliant’ costs software

Print This Post

3 May 2012


On 1 May Litigation Costs Services, the first costs drafting firm to be a Legal Futures Associate, celebrated its tenth anniversary with a reception held at the RAF Club in Piccadilly.

The guest list included various people connected with the firm over the years, as well as a number of well-known costs specialists including leading counsel and Master Andrew Gordon-Saker from the Senior Courts Costs Office.

Litigation Costs Services has evolved from the established niche costs firm of Group Litigation Costs Services (GLCS), which was launched on 1 May 2002 by Terry Wisdom, a founding member of the Association of Law Costs Draftsmen (now Association of Costs Lawyers) and Sue Nash, a costs draftsman/lawyer well known for her group litigation expertise.

The company’s re-branding as Litigation Costs Services reflects the firm’s expansion over the last few years into all areas of law costs drafting and consultancy.

As for the future, the firm is still growing and sees huge opportunities for costs professionals in the post-Jackson world. We are determined to keep abreast of (if not one step ahead of) the changes to the legal costs landscape, many of which are due to take effect from April 2013.

As part of this process we are developing costs software that will be fully ‘Jackson compliant’, enabling the production of costs budgets, costs schedules and bills of costs as outlined by Lord Justice Jackson in paragraphs 5.3-5.8 of chapter 45 of his final report. Extended services for litigants in person (now to be known as self-represented litigants) – including alternative dispute resolution – are also being looked at as are collaborations with other legal professionals.

We are always interested in talking to other forward thinking people and organisations – contact Sue Nash at sue@litigation-costs.co.uk

 



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

The importance of being expert

Steve Rowley 3

I recently sat on a panel debate in Manchester, with the debate entitled – ATE insurers and sub-£250k claims. Whilst the title of the debate was probably written ahead of the government’s consultation paper to introducing fixed recoverable costs in lower-value clinical negligence claims, where £25,000 rather than £250,000 is being recommended, it nevertheless raised an interesting point on how after-the-event insurers can make premiums proportionate to damages, especially for cases worth less than £25,000.

April 26th, 2017