National Accident Helpline welcomes SRA’s warning to legal profession

Print This Post

24 March 2016


National Accident Helpline200“As the founder of the Ethical Marketing Charter, National Accident Helpline (NAH) welcomes the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s decision to issue a warning notice to the profession highlighting the ongoing problem of cold calling.

“NAH continues to seek further reform and tighter regulation in this area. We have played a significant role in developing recommendations in this area during our involvement with the Insurance Fraud Task Force and at events such as the parliamentary roundtable we hosted in October.

“Almost 60 firms have signed up to commit to the standards upheld by the Ethical Marketing Charter since its launch in July 2015.

“Whilst this is a step in the right direction, cold calling remains a substantial problem. Ofcom estimates that UK consumers receive 4.8 billion nuisance calls each year.

“NAH has also seen a rapid increase in nuisance calls made in our name since 2014, with no signs of the problem abating. Each month we receive in the region of 200 complaints from consumers who have been cold called by a company pretending to be National Accident Helpline.

“We work with regulators to provide more intelligence to help tackle this issue than any other organisation in our sector.

“Whilst the SRA’S warning notice is welcome, much more needs to be done. Far from being widespread in the personal injury sector, we believe that malpractice is confined to a small number of rogue players who are tarnishing the good work done by the majority of claimant law firms.

“We would like to see the SRA proactively track these calls to their end user and take appropriate enforcement action where breaches are uncovered.”

Jonathan White, legal director, National Accident Helpline

 



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017