Maples Teesdale makes the switch to SOS Connect

Print This Post

11 June 2015


SOS200Niche law firm Maples Teesdale has opted to replace its incumbent legal software with SOS Connect from Solicitors Own Software (SOS).

The London-based commercial property firm is switching to SOS Connect after several years with Thomson Elite’s Envision system.

“We were looking for something more in keeping with the image we wanted to project as a law firm,” says Paul Burke, corporate and property finance partner at Maples Teesdale, which has around 60 fee earners involved in areas such as construction and engineering, finance, planning, litigation and dispute resolution.

“It was important that our legal software matched our expectations in terms of both our marketing and our ability to win and retain clients, and also our recruitment of high calibre people.

“I attended presentations from three potential providers and SOS really stood out as being extremely clear and well structured.

“It was immediately apparent that SOS Connect is very accessible and user-friendly, and is a perfect solution for sector-focused firm like ours.”

David McNamara, managing director of SOS, said: “As well as full practice law firms, SOS Connect is ideal for specialists such as Maples Teesdale. It is a great example of the type of ambitious, niche law firms which are signing up.”



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Legal Futures Blog

The skills shortage in law firms is the biggest threat to handling cybercrime

CLC Roundtable discussion at Malmaison Hotel, Charterhouse Square

The skills shortage in our businesses is the biggest threat to our industry when looking at cybercrime. Cybercriminals are not just after money but are looking for sensitive information too, so the legal services sector is an obvious target. In the last year we have had reports of around £7m of client money being lost to such crime. This is not an IT issue and it should not be left to the IT teams to sort out. It is a high-level responsibility and a board-level issue that must be taken seriously. We suspect that we will look back on 2016 and ask why we didn’t respond quicker.

March 21st, 2017