Legal Eye and St Giles Legal and Professional Risks have joined forces to offer solicitors a unique and exclusive risk and management package

Print This Post

29 July 2014


Strong compliance, lack of claims and intelligent anti-fraud processes are top of the agenda when PI insurers provide quotes to law firms.

With the recent announcement by the SRA on PI it is more important than ever that law firms proactively tend to their upcoming PI renewal sooner rather than later.

With this in mind Legal Eye and St Giles Legal and Professional Risks have joined forces to offer solicitors a unique and exclusive risk and management package.

Saving law firms valuable time St Giles will transfer your historical information to the 2014 PI form at no cost, reducing the administration burden that PI renewals bring each year.

In addition, if law firms send a proposal to St Giles, Legal Eye will provide a free compliance overview to the law firm enabling St Giles to negotiate the best terms available.

For further details please email the Legal Eye team today on info@legal-eye.co.uk.

The Legal Eye team members based in your area are confirmed below:

Midlands/North

Helen Glaze

Norman Denton

Rhonda Hales

Stella Duncan

South/South West/Wales

Ayishah Khalil

Emma Robins

Janine Betts

Jaunita Gobby

John Graham

Julie Gough

Loschinee Naidoo

Priya Anand Patel

Robin Marcus

Tina Gosal

Scotland/Northern Ireland

Jaunita Gobby

 



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Legal Futures Blog

The skills shortage in law firms is the biggest threat to handling cybercrime

CLC Roundtable discussion at Malmaison Hotel, Charterhouse Square

The skills shortage in our businesses is the biggest threat to our industry when looking at cybercrime. Cybercriminals are not just after money but are looking for sensitive information too, so the legal services sector is an obvious target. In the last year we have had reports of around £7m of client money being lost to such crime. This is not an IT issue and it should not be left to the IT teams to sort out. It is a high-level responsibility and a board-level issue that must be taken seriously. We suspect that we will look back on 2016 and ask why we didn’t respond quicker.

March 21st, 2017