Legal Eye adds outsourced secretarial and administrative support to law firm offering

Print This Post

1 June 2015


LegalEye200With the shortage of experienced conveyancing staff quoted to be as at “crisis point” Legal Eye are pleased to come to the rescue of overburdened law firms with new outsourced secretarial support -Virtual Eye.

Virtual Eye offers law firms a flexible secretarial service and administration support on an “as needed” basis and by a team of people with experience in the legal market.

Law firms only pay for the services and the time they use so it costs a fraction of hiring permanent or temporary staff.

Rachel MacLeod who heads up Virtual Eye says “The beauty of Virtual Eye for law firms is that the service can be used as and when required to ensure that during busy periods customer service is not compromised.”

Jaunita Gobby, Director of Legal Eye comments “Rachel has provided support services for Legal Eye and a selection of our clients for a number of years so it made sense to expand out to our entire customer base.”

CONTACT RACHEL NOW FOR A FREE, NO OBLIGATION CONSULTATION ON 07738 050212 or by email at rm@legal-eye.co.uk



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Legal Futures Blog

The rise of the multi-disciplinary lawyer: A challenge for legal education

Catrina Denvir

The legal profession has been on the receiving end of much hype regarding the impact of technology. Recent commentators purport that the aspiring lawyer must be a triple threat, possessing knowledge of the law, coding expertise, and in-depth knowledge of legal technology. Yet, focusing on legal technology risks overlooking the need for skills that transcend latest fads. Legal technology is a means by which to handle data: to organise it, record it, extract it, analyse it, predict from it and leverage it. Quantitative and statistical literacy – the ability to understand, apply, visualise and infer from data – underpins technological literacy and yet receives very little attention from those who encourage innovation in the legal curriculum.

May 26th, 2017