John Spencer appointed as member of Civil Justice Council

Print This Post

27 September 2013


John Spencer

John Spencer, Director of Spencers Solicitors, has been appointed as the solicitor representative member of the Civil Justice Council (CJC). His appointment will commence on 1 October 2013 and last for three years.

Established in 1997 with responsibility for overseeing and co-ordinating the modernisation of the justice system, the advisory body includes members such as the Right Hon Lord Dyson and Robin Knowles CBE, QC.

John’s voluntary role will see him providing advice the Lord Chancellor, the Judiciary and Civil Procedure Rule Committee in his capacity as solicitor member. As part of this role John will serve on at least one working party.  These committees provide advice on the effectiveness of aspects of the civil justice system, and make recommendations to test, review or conduct research into specific areas. Recently the Contingency Fees and Predictable Damages working parties have both looked at implementation of the Jackson Report.

John comes to this new appointment with over 25 years of experience in the PI sector. He has been Vice-President of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) since April 2013 and was awarded the Outstanding Achievement award at the Eclipse Proclaim 2012 Personal Injury Awards. He is a past Chairman of MASS (the Motor Accident Solicitors Society), and was its representative director on the Portal Company Board until March 2013.

Commenting on his appointment, John said:  “It is a great honour to be appointed to the CJC to represent all solicitors in England and Wales. I am very much looking forward to working with the Council, and hope that I can bring a fresh perspective on the civil justice system in advising the Government.”



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017