Hudgell Solicitors secures £14,000 compensation from dentist after botched bridge job caused ‘nightmare two-and-a-half-years’ for patient

Print This Post

12 August 2015


Hudgell_LogoMedical negligence specialists Hudgell Solicitors has secured £14,000 compensation for a dental patient who was left needing A&E treatment when his face ‘ballooned up’ after a botched bridge fitting.

David Mann thought he was guaranteed the very best treatment when learning of Philip Kurland’s history as a leading cosmetic dentist professional, with more than 30 years’ experience and having practised in London’s Harley Street.

But he faced a ‘nightmare’ two-and-a-half years of pain and has been left suffering from repeated abscesses to date, with only the legal representation of Hudgell Solicitors helping him to finally secure compensation to cover the £10,000 cost of repairing the damage done.

Mr Mann, 40, of Chichester, had initially simply been looking for a better solution to the two-tooth dental brace he wore, as he had been finding it uncomfortable.

He was advised by Kurland, who was practicing in the West Sussex city at the time, to have an extra tooth taken out, and a substantial bridge fitted which stretched across the space of five teeth – at the cost of £2,500.

However, what was supposed to be a simple procedure turned into a nightmare for Mr Mann, who now faces having to have a further two teeth removed as part of the work to correct the errors of the past.

Mr Kurland left the dental practice where he had carried out the work on Mr Mann shortly after, and it took representation through Hudgell Solicitors before a compensation payment was agreed through his insurers.

“This was a clear case of dental negligence, so much so that even today, more than two-and-a-half years after the original work to fit the bridge, our client is still no further in terms of receiving the treatment he requires. Indeed, he continues to suffer from regular, painful abscesses,” said Sarah Smith, trainee solicitor at Hudgell Solicitors, which has offices in Hull, Leeds and London.

“It not only cost him £2,500 for the original work which now needs replacing, but also extra costs in root canal treatment which was also needed following the poorly fitted bridge and subsequent abscesses. He has also had to take antibiotics repeatedly to lessen the pain.

“Added to this, the dentist dragged this matter out during the legal process, leaving Mr Mann in limbo over his dental health. He was unable to find any dentists willing to take on repair work with legal action pending, and as the initial work had been done in private, he was unable to get help on the NHS.

“He could and should have been compensated much earlier. Thankfully now, with this settlement, he’ll be able to cover the costs of the treatment he needs, and have some money left over to compensate for the pain and suffering he has experienced.”

Mr Mann described it as a ‘nightmare from the very start’.

“Now I need to have all the work done again from scratch, including having yet more teeth removed, all because of the damage caused over the past two-and-a-half years,” he added.

“As soon as he first fitted the bridge I found it very uncomfortable and painful, it was crooked and twisted, but he just said it was to be expected because of the work that had been done, and that it would soon settle down.

“After a week I returned and he reluctantly agreed to take it off and put a temporary bridge in place until a permanent replacement was ready. From that point on I continued to suffer from really bad pains and toothache, which I knew must have been down to the bridge.

“Each time I went to the dentist I told him about the pains, but his answer was to just take antibiotics, which I said I didn’t want to do. He was very dismissive.

“When I returned to have the new permanent bridge fitted a month later, there was a really bad smell when he took the temporary one out. I warned him then that I’d been experiencing a really bad taste in my mouth, and that there must be something wrong.

“I could only really explain it as tasting like an infection. I knew there was a problem, but again he said it was normal and that the pain had been due to the nerve being exposed, saying it would settle with the new bridge fitted.”

With the replacement bridge fitted, Mr Mann hoped the dentist would soon be proved right, and that the pain would disappear.

However, in the days after, the right-hand side of his face began to swell badly, so much so that he needed treatment in his local hospital A&E department, where a large abscess was found.

“I can remember my partner Samantha looking at me in horror and saying my face had just ballooned up on one side,” he said.

“She said that I looked like a hamster. It got so bad that my eye on the right side of my face was almost completely closed and my partner said ‘we’ve got to get you to hospital.”



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Legal Futures Blog

The security of certainty

Michael Wildy Allianz

What are our considerations when looking to buy home or car cover? I would imagine price would certainly be amongst the considerations, but I’m confident that we would each weigh up whether or not our chosen insurer could meet any claims we might bring, and perhaps as importantly, whether they’d provide us with a hassle-free claims process were the worst to happen. Legal expenses insurance should be no different.

December 6th, 2016