DAS highlights importance of access to justice following Competition Commission review

Print This Post

23 December 2013


Leading legal expenses insurer DAS broadly welcomes the Competition Commission provisional findings on the private motor market but urges caution on how it now progresses.

Richard Harris, head of claims at DAS UK Group, said: “We have read the Competition Commission investigation with interest and intend to submit responses to some of the remedies that are proposed within it. The overarching theme of our responses will be that access to justice is not compromised in the pursuit of reducing premiums.

“We acknowledge that the commission has put the customer at the heart of its proposals and we would seek assurance that there are no unintended consequences as a result of the remedies.

“The law is in place to protect individuals and the industry must be careful to ensure these rights for individuals are not compromised in an attempt to lower motor premiums across the market as a whole. These premiums are influenced by many other factors that are well within the control of general insurers.

“We particularly welcome the Competition Commission proposals to increase the awareness of consumer’s legal rights following an accident. These proposals complement the findings of the Financial Conduct Authority in its thematic review of motor legal expenses insurance (MLEI) – particularly the need to increase customer understanding of the product.

“DAS has already undertaken a significant amount of work to improve how we highlight this to our customers in our literature and processes and we will continue to work on improving this understanding.”

For add-ons, DAS wants much greater transparency of the value for money these products can offer customers.

Richard Harris added: “Policyholders should be able to compare and understand on what basis those add-ons, especially motor legal expenses, operate. Whilst the basic features of MLEI are common to most products, individual policies can differ greatly.

“An example is the inclusion in some policies of damaged-based agreements (DBAs) that can see customers surrender up to 25% of any damages they receive after being injured in a non-fault accident.”



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017