Conveyancers remain vulnerable to fraud with only a third e-verifying client’s identity

Print This Post

23 March 2016


Searchflow 2016Only a third of conveyancers are carrying out electronic AML checks for all transactions reveals SearchFlow, specialists in property intelligence.

SearchFlow’s conveyancing sentiment survey reveals that 38% of conveyancers never carry out electronic identity checks to verify the identity of a customer and the remaining 29% only sometimes carry out electronic AML checks.

The survey also revealed a stark difference with identity check practices by company size. Sole practitioners are leaving themselves more exposed to the risk of identity theft as only 5% carry out electronic checks for all transactions. In contrast, half of larger firms, of 15+ partners, carry out electronic checks for all transactions.

Greg Bryce, managing director of SearchFlow, comments: “Despite the growing risks, many conveyancers are still merely asking to see their clients with their documentation and do not make the necessary electronic checks to verify the identity of their client.

“Conveyancers are leaving themselves open to criminal activity that can seriously impact their careers and reputations. Money laundering schemes are continually adapting with more sophisticated means to scam the profession and it is a problem that is on the rise.

“It is startling that so many are still not carrying out electronic checks on identification and worrying that sole practitioners are leaving themselves particularly exposed to this area of risk.”

Electronic AML checks can be purchased as a low cost report which offers vital protection, reassurance and time savings. Partnering with GB Group, the global leaders in identity data intelligence solutions, SearchFlow’s fully integrated and detailed AML report gives extensive and instant results.

It will reduce time spent checking documents, allowing conveyancers to proceed with their job knowing that this very concerning area of risk has been dealt with.

GB Group utilises the most comprehensive suite of data sets that are updated daily and sourced from over 240 countries. It is then analysed and presented using a risk-based approach whilst flagging data mismatches and offers a full five year electronic audit trail.



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017