350th firm signs up for Advanced Legal PCMS

Print This Post

15 December 2014


Northampton based Max Engel & Co LLP signs up for ALB

Max Engel & Co LLP has become the 350th firm to sign up for ALB, ’s fully integrated practice and case management system (PCMS).

The multi-year deal will see the Northampton based law firm replace its existing system with ALB, which will be rolled out to the firm’s 17 staff in early 2015.

The firm has recently undertaken a complete review of its IT systems as it looks to update its business systems and modernise its practice infrastructure.  As a result, the firm selected Advanced Legal as its PCMS partner of choice.

Helen Carville, managing partner at Max Engel, said: “We needed an integrated solution that would remove manual activity and streamline our processes.  ALB gives us that package, pulling client, case and matter management into one location, centralising time recording and simplifying the business reporting process.

“We were not only impressed by the technology but also by the Advanced team who took the time to understand where we were as a practice and where we wanted to go.  They listened, engaged and delivered a solution to precisely meet our business needs.”

Advanced has seen rapid growth in market demand for its solutions during 2014, with more than 50 firms selecting ALB since March 2014.

Doug Hargrove, Managing Director at Advanced Legal, said: “It’s great to welcome Max Engel into our ALB community.  350 firms is a fantastic milestone for ALB and the increasing rate of adoption over the last 12 months simply shows that more and more firms are realising the value they can get from a fully integrated PCMS.”

 



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Legal Futures Blog

McKenzie Friends – a storm in a teapot

Legal Futures Conference 2011Photo by Jonathan Goldberg

If the recent furore about McKenzie Friend Marketplace shows anything, it is that the profession remains acutely sensitive to the apparent threat of competition by unregulated entrants into the legal landscape. But for an outside observer, the whole McKenzie Friend debate remains curiously overblown: if not a storm in a teacup, a storm at least in a teapot. For all the characteristic sturm und drang of the Law Society’s response to last year’s senior judiciary consultation, there was pretty widespread agreement among most respondents that McKenzie Friends are here to stay.

April 28th, 2017